you're reading...
Video Games


A federal judge in New Jersey District Court has dismissed the suit of Quarterback Ryan Hart who filed a suit, also seeking class action status, that Electronic Arts had appropriated his likeness without compensation. This is not the first bump the suit has taken. In September 2010, several causes of action, including unjust enrichment and conspiracy, were dismissed; however, Hart was able to file an amended complaint. Today’s dismissal closes the door in the trial court and an appeal should be expected. Particularly since other courts have entertained these cases, there is a potential for there to be an eventual split in the circuits up to the Supreme Court.

Sports fans, and those of South Park, know that colleges prevent athletes from entering into licensing deals while they play in college. However, the same leagues and universities that prevent the players from entering into licensing deals, themselves enter into licensing deals, such as with Electronic Arts. Here, Hart was an NCAA football player in an NCAA Football video game, where a virtual character with his same college jersey number, height, weight, stats, uniform, etc., appears as a playable character. Electronic Arts persuaded the court that there was a freedom of artistic expression issue which outweighed the right to control one’s publicity. Particularly persuasive to the court was that the character was a ‘starting point’ where the video game player could switch teams, appearance, stats, and so on, of that character to a myriad of combinations.

So, say a character with your exact appearance appeared in a video game: same features, hair style, weight, height, statistics, identifying markers, and so on, wearing the outfit you are best known for wearing. As long as the video game player has the *option* of making you taller or shorter, heavier or thinner, changing your clothes, changing your hair, and so on, the video game maker would not owe you a dime.


About Nerds in Court

John G. Nowakowski, Esq. (LLMT), is a graduate of the University of San Diego School of Law, and is licensed to practice law in California and Nevada. Christina R. Evola, Esq. is a recent graduate of the University of San Diego School of Law where her studies focused on intellectual property, antitrust, and media law. She is a lifelong gamer and avid cosplayer. DISCLAIMER: ‘Nerds in Court’ is for entertainment purposes only. Nothing should be construed as legal advice, or any advice for that matter, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by reading these posts. Do not consider information provided here as a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified, licensed attorney in your state.


No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Twitter Updates


Blog Directory
Add blog to our directory.
%d bloggers like this: